このアイテムのアクセス数: 753
このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル | 記述 | サイズ | フォーマット | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scientia_3_72.pdf | 962.3 kB | Adobe PDF | 見る/開く |
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド | 値 | 言語 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 飯泉, 佑介 | ja |
dc.contributor.alternative | IIZUMI, Yusuke | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-14T00:29:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-14T00:29:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-03-01 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2433/279655 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, I examine the structure of Hegel's philosophical method followed by, as well as argued in, his major work, Science of Logic (1812–13, 1816/1832). Hegel's conception of “method, ” which is formulated as “the Self-movement of the Concept” in the last section of Logic, “the Absolute Idea, ” is still controversial in contemporary philosophy. To solve the problem of how and why Hegel can argue that a Concept moves to another Concept by itself in his philosophical system, some scholars focus on the logic of “determinate negation, ” which explains the Hegelian methodological principle that self-controversy does not come to “nothing” but generates determinate positive content. Others interpret the Self-movement of the Concept as “speculative inference.” According to them, the unique logical inference constructed by the Concept's three structural moments --the universality, the particularity, and the singularity-- shows itself as movement. However, both interpretations are not sufficient to justify Hegel's methodological argument, especially regarding the negativity and the determinatedness of the Concept. Based on this background, I analyze the structure of “the Self-movement of the Concept” described in the section of “the Absolute Idea” and attempt to prove that it is a self-negating and self-determinating activity of the Concept itself. In my view, the movement of the Concept is summarized as follows: Once the Concept is determined as a universal, it turns out to be a particular immediately, negating its universal form, and further turns out to be a singular with the negation of its particular form. This dynamic indicates that the negative determinatedness of the Concept and its negating-determinating activity are inseparable, and this is what Hegel calls the identity of Content and Form in the context of his methodology. Although it is not a kind of general method applied to the entire Logic, but appropriates only to “the Absolute Idea, ” my thesis shows that this method may establish the foundation of Hegel's whole system of philosophy, “the Science, ” characterized by the identity of Content and Form. | en |
dc.language.iso | jpn | - |
dc.publisher | 京都大学大学院文学研究科西洋近世哲学史研究室 | ja |
dc.publisher.alternative | The Department of the History of Modern Western Philosophy at Kyoto University | en |
dc.subject.ndc | 130 | - |
dc.title | <招待論文>概念の自己運動に関する一考察 --ヘーゲル論理学における方法の再検討-- | ja |
dc.title.alternative | <Invited Article>A Study of the Self-movement of the Concept: Reexamining the Method of Hegel's Logic | en |
dc.type | departmental bulletin paper | - |
dc.type.niitype | Departmental Bulletin Paper | - |
dc.identifier.jtitle | Scientia : Journal of Modern Western Philosophy | en |
dc.identifier.volume | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 72 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 91 | - |
dc.textversion | publisher | - |
dc.sortkey | 07 | - |
dc.address | 日本学術振興会特別研究員PD(京都大学) | ja |
dc.identifier.selfDOI | 10.14989/279655 | - |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | - |
datacite.awardNumber | 21J01594 | - |
datacite.awardNumber.uri | https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-21J01594/ | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2436-3057 | - |
jpcoar.funderName | 日本学術振興会 | ja |
jpcoar.awardTitle | 体系期ヘーゲル哲学のメタ形而上学的再構成: 新実在論の観点を踏まえて | ja |
出現コレクション: | Vol. 3 |

このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。