このアイテムのアクセス数: 87

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
j.egyr.2022.07.126.pdf1.27 MBAdobe PDF見る/開く
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド言語
dc.contributor.authorIlham, Zulen
dc.contributor.authorSubramaniam, Indranien
dc.contributor.authorJamaludin, Adi Ainurzamanen
dc.contributor.authorWan-Mohtar, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imaden
dc.contributor.authorHalim-Lim, Sarina Abdulen
dc.contributor.authorOhgaki, Hideakien
dc.contributor.authorIshihara, Keiichien
dc.contributor.authorMansor, Mohd Radzi Abuen
dc.contributor.alternative大垣, 英明ja
dc.contributor.alternative石原, 慶一ja
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-23T02:50:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-23T02:50:52Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/284748-
dc.description.abstractIn order to progress towards a more sustainable energy future, Malaysia should reduce its reliance on fossil-based energy sources and shifting to green and renewable energy. Therefore, focus on energy education awareness programmes emphasising sustainable behaviours and frameworks are required. These programmes connect with Sustainable Development Goal 7 of the United Nations, which is to provide affordable and clean energy. In this study, dimensions and indicators of a framework for energy education were studied and evaluated in an effort to improve decision making. This study systematic approach comprised a review of relevant literature and consultation with an ad hoc panel of energy education experts via surveys, interviews, and questionnaires. This study also included an analytic hierarchy process to evaluate the framework’s criteria selection, alternative indicators, and priority or weights. The results indicated that the “Aim to minimise climate change” dimension is deemed the most essential criterion for selecting energy education dimension criteria. On the other hand, “National policy makers” is the most essential stakeholder across all parties. It has been determined that the use of analytic hierarchy process to the design of the framework for energy education in Malaysia could help simplifies a systematic decision-making process.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier BVen
dc.rights© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.en
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectAnalytic hierarchy processen
dc.subjectEnergy educationen
dc.subjectEnergy policyen
dc.subjectIndicatoren
dc.subjectSustainabilityen
dc.titleAnalysing dimensions and indicators to design energy education framework in Malaysia using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)en
dc.typejournal article-
dc.type.niitypeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.jtitleEnergy Reportsen
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.spage1013-
dc.identifier.epage1024-
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.126-
dc.textversionpublisher-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dc.identifier.eissn2352-4847-
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このアイテムは次のライセンスが設定されています: クリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンス Creative Commons