このアイテムのアクセス数: 50
このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル | 記述 | サイズ | フォーマット | |
---|---|---|---|---|
j.heliyon.2024.e36144.pdf | 4.4 MB | Adobe PDF | 見る/開く |
タイトル: | Development of deep learning model for diagnosing muscle-invasive bladder cancer on MRI with vision transformer |
著者: | Kurata, Yasuhisa Nishio, Mizuho Moribata, Yusaku Otani, Satoshi Himoto, Yuki ![]() ![]() ![]() Takahashi, Satoru Kusakabe, Jiro Okura, Ryota Shimizu, Marina Hidaka, Keisuke Nishio, Naoko Furuta, Akihiko Kido, Aki Masui, Kimihiko ![]() ![]() Onishi, Hiroyuki Segawa, Takehiko Kobayashi, Takashi Nakamoto, Yuji |
著者名の別形: | 倉田, 靖桐 西尾, 瑞穂 樋本, 祐紀 木戸, 晶 増井, 仁彦 小林, 恭 中本, 裕士 |
キーワード: | Bladder cancer Deep learning Convolutional neural network MRI Vision transformer |
発行日: | 30-Aug-2024 |
出版者: | Elsevier BV |
誌名: | Heliyon |
巻: | 10 |
号: | 16 |
論文番号: | e36144 |
抄録: | Rationale and objectives: To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model to automatically diagnose muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) on MRI with Vision Transformer (ViT). Materials and methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with BC who reported to two institutions between January 2016 and June 2020 (training dataset) and a third institution between May 2017 and May 2022 (test dataset). The diagnostic model for MIBC and the segmentation model for BC on MRI were developed using the training dataset with 5-fold cross-validation. ViT- and convolutional neural network (CNN)-based diagnostic models were developed and compared for diagnostic performance using the area under the curve (AUC). The performance of the diagnostic model with manual and auto-generated regions of interest (ROImanual and ROIauto, respectively) was validated on the test dataset and compared to that of radiologists (three senior and three junior radiologists) using Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System scoring. Results: The training and test datasets included 170 and 53 patients, respectively. Mean AUC of the top 10 ViT-based models with 5-fold cross-validation outperformed those of the CNN-based models (0.831 ± 0.003 vs. 0.713 ± 0.007–0.812 ± 0.006, p < .001). The diagnostic model with ROImanual achieved AUC of 0.872 (95 % CI: 0.777, 0.968), which was comparable to that of junior radiologists (AUC = 0.862, 0.873, and 0.930). Semi-automated diagnosis with the diagnostic model with ROIauto achieved AUC of 0.815 (95 % CI: 0.696, 0.935). Conclusion: The DL model effectively diagnosed MIBC. The ViT-based model outperformed CNN-based models, highlighting its utility in medical image analysis. |
著作権等: | © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2433/290119 |
DOI(出版社版): | 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36144 |
PubMed ID: | 39253215 |
出現コレクション: | 学術雑誌掲載論文等 |

このアイテムは次のライセンスが設定されています: クリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンス