このアイテムのアクセス数: 50

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
j.heliyon.2024.e36144.pdf4.4 MBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: Development of deep learning model for diagnosing muscle-invasive bladder cancer on MRI with vision transformer
著者: Kurata, Yasuhisa
Nishio, Mizuho
Moribata, Yusaku
Otani, Satoshi
Himoto, Yuki  kyouindb  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8508-8221 (unconfirmed)
Takahashi, Satoru
Kusakabe, Jiro
Okura, Ryota
Shimizu, Marina
Hidaka, Keisuke
Nishio, Naoko
Furuta, Akihiko
Kido, Aki
Masui, Kimihiko  kyouindb  KAKEN_id
Onishi, Hiroyuki
Segawa, Takehiko
Kobayashi, Takashi
Nakamoto, Yuji
著者名の別形: 倉田, 靖桐
西尾, 瑞穂
樋本, 祐紀
木戸, 晶
増井, 仁彦
小林, 恭
中本, 裕士
キーワード: Bladder cancer
Deep learning
Convolutional neural network
MRI
Vision transformer
発行日: 30-Aug-2024
出版者: Elsevier BV
誌名: Heliyon
巻: 10
号: 16
論文番号: e36144
抄録: Rationale and objectives: To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model to automatically diagnose muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) on MRI with Vision Transformer (ViT). Materials and methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with BC who reported to two institutions between January 2016 and June 2020 (training dataset) and a third institution between May 2017 and May 2022 (test dataset). The diagnostic model for MIBC and the segmentation model for BC on MRI were developed using the training dataset with 5-fold cross-validation. ViT- and convolutional neural network (CNN)-based diagnostic models were developed and compared for diagnostic performance using the area under the curve (AUC). The performance of the diagnostic model with manual and auto-generated regions of interest (ROImanual and ROIauto, respectively) was validated on the test dataset and compared to that of radiologists (three senior and three junior radiologists) using Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System scoring. Results: The training and test datasets included 170 and 53 patients, respectively. Mean AUC of the top 10 ViT-based models with 5-fold cross-validation outperformed those of the CNN-based models (0.831 ± 0.003 vs. 0.713 ± 0.007–0.812 ± 0.006, p < .001). The diagnostic model with ROImanual achieved AUC of 0.872 (95 % CI: 0.777, 0.968), which was comparable to that of junior radiologists (AUC = 0.862, 0.873, and 0.930). Semi-automated diagnosis with the diagnostic model with ROIauto achieved AUC of 0.815 (95 % CI: 0.696, 0.935). Conclusion: The DL model effectively diagnosed MIBC. The ViT-based model outperformed CNN-based models, highlighting its utility in medical image analysis.
著作権等: © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/290119
DOI(出版社版): 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36144
PubMed ID: 39253215
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このアイテムは次のライセンスが設定されています: クリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンス Creative Commons