ダウンロード数: 2016
このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル | 記述 | サイズ | フォーマット | |
---|---|---|---|---|
eda056_139.pdf | 1.47 MB | Adobe PDF | 見る/開く |
タイトル: | 「存在しない女」の審級 : エウリピデスの『メデア』に寄せて |
その他のタイトル: | Instance of Woman Who Does Not Exist : For Euripides Medea |
著者: | 春木, 奈美子 |
著者名の別形: | HARUKI, Namiko |
発行日: | 31-Mar-2010 |
出版者: | 京都大学大学院教育学研究科 |
誌名: | 京都大学大学院教育学研究科紀要 |
巻: | 56 |
開始ページ: | 139 |
終了ページ: | 151 |
抄録: | The end of analysis is one of the questions that have been discussed since the beginning of psychoanalysis. Freud took a negative position, saying that there is a rock of castration beyond which analysis would go no further. Contrary to Freud, late Lacan takes a radical step with the concept of "Identification with symptom". At first, Lacan accented the Symbolic and defined the traversing fantasy as issues of analysis. Later, as the Real takes on importance in his theory, the identification with symptom is repeatedly emphasized. This theoretical turn results from his original reflections on femininity. The concepts of femininity and enjoyment around his famous thesis "Woman does not exist" are articulated by examining two acts : Medea's murder of her own children and Gide's wife's burning of his letters. These two acts are homologous in terms of the woman who does not exist, or the true woman. Another possibility of cure emerges in the identification with symptom. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2433/108484 |
出現コレクション: | 第56号 |
このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。